Efecto aditivo de las células madre mesenquimales y del defibrótido en un modelo de trombosis arterial en ratas / Additive effect of mesenchymal stem cells and defibrotide in an arterial rat thrombosis model

Introducción. El objetivo de este estudio consistió en investigar el efecto aditivo de las células madre mesenquimales (MSC, por sus siglas en inglés) y del defibrótido (DFT) en un modelo de trombosis arterial femoral en ratas. Métodos. Se incluyeron 30 ratas Sprague Dawley. Se desarrolló un modelo de trombosis arterial mediante cloruro de hierro (FeCl3) en la arteria femoral izquierda. Las ratas se asignaron equitativamente en cinco grupos: grupo 1, intervención quirúrgica simulada (sin lesión arterial); grupo 2, inyección de solución salina tamponada con fosfato (PBS); grupo 3, MSC; grupo 4, DFT; grupo 5, MSC + DFT. Todas las ratas recibieron dos inyecciones intraperitoneales de 0,5 ml: la primera se administró 4 horas después del procedimiento y la segunda 48 horas después de la primera. Se sacrificó a las ratas siete días después de la segunda inyección. Resultados. Aunque el uso por separado de MSC derivadas de médula ósea humana (hBM-MSC) o de DFT permitió una resolución parcial del trombo, la combinación de ambos tuvo como resultado la resolución casi completa. La neovascularización fue doblemente mejor en las ratas tratadas con hBM-MSC + DFT (11,6 ± 2,4 canales) en comparación con los grupos asignados por separado a hBM-MSC (3,8 ± 2,7 canales) y DFT (5,5 ± 1,8 canales) (P < 0,0001 y P= 0,002, respectivamente). Conclusión. El uso combinado de hBM-MSC y DFT en un modelo de trombosis arterial en ratas mostró que el efecto aditivo tuvo como resultado la resolución casi completa del trombo.

Background/aim. In this study, we aimed to investigate the additive effect of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and defibrotide (DFT) in a rat model of femoral arterial thrombosis. Methods. Thirty Sprague Dawley rats were included. An arterial thrombosis model by ferric chloride (FeCl3) was developed in the left femoral artery. The rats were equally assigned to 5 groups: Group 1-Sham-operated (without arterial injury); Group 2-Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) injected; Group 3-MSC; Group 4-DFT; Group 5-MSC + DFT. All had two intraperitoneal injections of 0.5 ml: the 1st injection was 4 h after the procedure and the 2nd one 48 h after the 1st injection. The rats were sacrificed 7 days after the 2nd injection. Results. Although the use of human bone marrow-derived (hBM) hBM-MSC or DFT alone enabled partial resolution of the thrombus, combining them resulted in near-complete resolution. Neovascularization was two-fold better in hBM-MSC + DFT treated rats (11.6 ± 2.4 channels) compared with the hBM-MSC (3.8 ± 2.7 channels) and DFT groups (5.5 ± 1.8 channels) (P < 0.0001 and P= 0.002, respectively). Conclusion. The combined use of hBM-MSC and DFT in a rat model of arterial thrombosis showed additive effect resulting in near-complete resolution of the thrombus.

Effects of Polydeoxyribonucleotide in the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers

This study aimed to examine the positive effects of polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) on the wound-healing process in pressure ulcers. In this randomized controlled trial, the effects of PDRN were compared over time between an experimental group (n=11) and a control group (n=12). The former was administered the same dose of PDRN intramuscularly (1 ampule, 3 mL, 5.625 mg, for 5 days) for 2 weeks and perilesionally (1 ampule, 3 mL, 5.625 mg, twice a week) for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint for determining efficacy was wound healing in the pressure ulcers, which was reflected by the wound surface area determined using VISITRAK Digital (Smith & Nephew, Largo, FL). The secondary endpoint was the pressure ulcer scale for healing score, determined using pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH Tool 3.0 developed by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel). After the 4-week treatment period, PDRN therapy was found to significantly reduce the wound size and PUSH score, without adverse effect during the treatment. The findings indicate that PDRN can positively modify the wound healing process in pressure ulcers, and its use could improve the clinical outcomes of patients and lower the need for additional therapies or hospital stay.